A lot of money on government projects was spent by the county’s former manager without approval, according to members of the Jackson County Board of Commissioners.
The issue came up at Monday night’s BOC meeting when the board went back and approved money that former county manager Darrell Hampton had already spent.
County policy states that purchases over $20,000 must be approved by the BOC. But chairman Hunter Bicknell said officials discovered “two or three months ago” that Hampton had not always followed that rule. He said that $3.5 million to $5 million in projects were approved by the former county manager.
The issue came up when the board voted to belatedly approve a $2.4 million upgrade to the county’s public safety communication system. The upgrade was authorized by the former county manager, but was never brought before the full BOC for a vote or discussion. Commissioner Tom Crow questioned why the BOC is being asked to fund this after the equipment has already been installed.
Commissioner Chas Hardy asked Crow why he wasn’t asking questions “months ago.”
“Where were the red flags months ago,” he asked Crow. “Why weren’t you asking questions then… You enjoy the pleasures of grandstanding and that you uncovered it…It is time to move on.”
For the full story, see the Oct. 19 issue of The Jackson Herald.

The BOC approved intergovernmental agreements for radio tower sites months ago ? But they knew nothing ??? Really ??
Crow, Smith and Hardy all knew about this months ago just don't want to admit it.
That is why they don't want to talk about it... no public bid . No public specs. Nothing.
What should happen is a full investigation as to why 2.4 million was spent with out over site.
Last comment to Mike Buffington. Next time dig deeper when you get a tip on a story.
1. They have installed a system that no scanner can cover. There accountable to no one at all media included.(can't hear it !)
2. The powers at be were bought and paid for by Motorola who came up with the whole "narrowbanding" excuse. Banks county and others spent $40,000 narrowbanding there system .
Wait 5 years and the whole system will be obsolute. Mark my words Jackson county just started a money pit process that will cost for years.
Blaming a "former " manager is nothing more then an excuse. #1 is right all show !
second if the Sheriff wasnt hiding what his dept was doing why would they need narrow banding?
Something is starting to give a bad smell and there is no FISHERMENS WHARF in JAckson county, but I suspect many Wharf Rats!!!!
And our Sheriff write him an email and wait till the place freezes over before you get an answer.
Maybe all this poor under the table management choke choke laugh laugh is why my taxes are 50% higher than the national average. It is a disgrace what they charge and offer literally nothing in return other than a visible patrol car or two.
Someone needs to audit the Jackson County books. It is time we all take our government back and quit whining if you do not vote.
Someone needs to put Hulsey under a microscope and find out why millions gets spent without him redflagging them ?
Talked with some law enforcement folks today and they are not impressed with the new system. Watch this whole thing blow up into we bought a lemon.
That was supposed to be used to add personal to the jail not for a countywide radio system ?
Hey Barney if you have nothing to hide why Encrypt the system ? 9 times out of 10 when systems encrypt its to hide what they are or not doing.
The whole fiasco is another reason why we need to vote them all out. Starting with Tom Crow and ending with the head thief Bicknell.
Where is the Jackson herald ?? Oh yeah worrying about booster club funds and HS pranks while 5 Million goes POOF !
The tax payers in Jackson got screwed again !
Mandated my butt! only Private frequencies of private companied were mandated. here you go
In the radio spectrum set aside for public safety communications, agencies and jurisdiction licensed and operating in the following bands will need to comply with the narrowbanding mandate;
Very High Frequency (VHF) - High Band Range
148-174 MHz
Ultra High Frequency (UHF)
450-512 MHz
This will not affect every one. Agencies and jurisdictions licensed and operating in the following bands are NOT subject to the narrowbanding mandate;
VHF Low Band Range
25-50 MHz
800 MHz
Conventional or Trunked
Banks county completed narrow banding for less then $40,000. All they had to do was up date there repeaters and a few radios.
Encryption and digital has nothing to do with narrow banding. That was a feature law enforcement wanted so no one can monitor them (AKA do what we want)
There was no requirement to go to a trunked ,digital and encrypted system. The big question that no one wants to ask is???
Why was it done behind closed doors with no public bid and or specs ?
The narrow banding effecting Jackson was :
After 15 years, numerous Petitions for Reconsideration and other challenges, the final FCC plan was decreed by the Commission early in 2007, with the setting of firm dates for the transition. The proceeding enacts a maximum 12.5 kHz bandwidth across the land mobile bands between 150-512 MHz, and increases available channels by creating new ones between existing channels.
While 12.5 kHz channel spacing is widely mentioned in communications media, there is usually no corresponding mention of the difference in channel spacing between VHF and UHF, which leads to the erroneous assumption that 12.5 kHz will be the standard channel spacing across the board. In truth, 12.5 kHz channel spacing (and eventually 6.25 kHz) only affects UHF between 420 and 512 MHz.
VHF land mobile narrowband uses 7.5 kHz spacing. Existing VHF channels will remain, with new ones - already in use in some areas for the past few years, mostly in the public safety portion of the band - created between existing channels.
In other words Jackson had to be narrowband "capable" by 2013 but the channels they had would remain.
Bottom Line_ They bought a Cadillac when all they needed was a Chevy.