What are the most efficient school systems in the area?
With budget cuts, furlough days and other financial moves by area school systems during the economic downturn, how schools spend their money has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years.
In the four counties served by Mainstreet Newspapers (Jackson, Barrow, Banks and Madison counties), plus nearby Oconee County for balance, the most efficient school system in spending per student is the Jefferson City School System, which in FY2010 spent $7,169 per student. That is among schools with the lowest spending per student in the state.
That is in contrast to the Jackson County School System, which spent $8,875 per student in FY2010, $1,700 per student more than Jefferson. That was the highest in the five-county area and ranked the system 69th in the state in per student spending.
Perhaps surprisingly, the Barrow County School System, which is the largest in the group with over 12,400 students, was second only to Jefferson in per student spending at $7,804, which is $1,000 less per student than the Jackson County system.
DIFFERENCES
So what makes up the difference in spending? When broken down by spending areas, it becomes clear that some school systems spend much more on overhead expenses than other systems.
In “school administration” expenses, for example, the per student spending ranges from a low of $420 per student in Banks County to a high of $757 in the City of Commerce School System.
In “maintenance and overhead” costs, the range went from a low of $481 per student in Jefferson to a high of $786 per student in the Jackson County system.
Some of the differences in per student costs reflect a school system’s size as well as its spending habits. The City of Commerce School System, for example, spent a high $513 per student in “general administrative” expenses; but the system only has 1,430 students to split up the cost of those core administrative expenses which exist in every school system. Barrow County, for example, has 12,400 students to split those costs, which gave that system a low $163 per student cost in “general administrative” expenses.
COST CONTROLS
Some records on Georgia school spending seem to suggest that one of the major differences in what schools spend per student today flows from how individual systems controlled their cost during the “boom” years.
The City of Jefferson system, for example, showed a 66 percent increase in overall student population during FY2003-2008, but during the same period only allowed its per student expense to climb 16 percent. Likewise in Barrow County, where the system posted a 30 percent increase in students over that 5-year period, but only spent 17 percent more per student at the end of the time.
Compare that to the Jackson County system that had a 28 percent hike in students but a 38 percent jump in per student spending. Banks County was even more startling with a 15 percent jump in students, but a whopping 43 percent hike in per student spending.

I don't have a dog in this fight so to speak but I'd like to make a cognizant statement based on the information presented.
As far as the cost per student is concerned, comparing a smallish city school system to a much larger county system is erroneous when factoring in "maintenance and overhead." Jackson County is approximately 343 square miles with the cities of Jefferson and Commerce encompassing about 19 and 8 square miles respectively. This gives a net of about 316 square miles for the county school system to cover based on city school students living within the approximate city boundaries.
So what does this mean? It means that busing, which is a major component of a school system M&O budget, accounts for a much larger portion the budget due to larger coverage area to get the students from far and wide. 316 sq. miles vs. 19 or 8 sq. miles is a greater expense no matter how you slice the numbers, per capita or otherwise. Additionally, city school systems are generally able to use less facilities and campuses due to the nature of a city being smaller in size though more students can be housed in the city system in some cases. With county school systems, especially under the current trend of neighborhood schooling with elementary schools, the facilities must be spread out over the 316 sq. miles thereby adding additional M&O and capital costs. Sometimes it's just apples vs oranges.
As for salaries, there is not a huge discrepancy when it comes down to it. Different school systems are often under somewhat different mandates and operate slightly different programs based on test scores, poverty level, etc. Some of the positions in the county may be funded via specialized grants. This information is not given so I can't say for sure.
As for the publishing of school system salaries in the print edition...again...pretty tacky, especially since you use $30,000 as your starting point for your premise that school system employees are overpaid. Hardly. Also, you should not have included the substitute positions in your comparative counts (though you noted them) as that skews the data because schools may have hundreds of subs on roster that are never used. It just becomes a nice sound bite to say that a system has 1,100 plus employees.
-NAF
Have a great weekend all.
NAF
How many out of district students attend the City of Jefferson schools? If the system spends $7,169 on each out of district student, then I wonder why no one is asking why the system does not charge $7,169 to out of district students? What are they charged? If city residents, with or without children, are forced to pay the school tax, it would only seem fair in my eyes that those who do not pay the tax have to pay the true cost in the form of a user fee. Currently this user fee only covers a small portion of the actual cost, leaving the city school tax to cover the rest.
I think that you might get more support for helping the schools if you look into the simple ways that the schools could increase revenue rather than just making statements that it can't be done. If people pay for the benefit, don't rely on city tax payers to cover the extra, and everyone gets out of the mentality that we need to rob Peter to pay Paul then some beneficial changes could be made. It will jsut take some people with the ability to realize that things do not always have to remain the same forever!
Look forward to your reply.
As for revenues, schools are limited by law as to what they can do to tax or charge fees; they are much more regulated than other local governments in that way. They don't legally have the option to levy just any fee they want to.
What you fail to point out here that was in the story is that the Jackson County School System has among the highest per student spending for School Administration and M&O in the state... top 20%.
As for Clarke County, that is not a comparison in that it's an urban system, not a suburban or rural system. Would you want to compare to the Atlanta Public Schools?
As for school equipment and crowding, well that's in the eye of the beholder. Do you want us to do a story comparing area schools in SAT, EOCT and other academic areas? Are you getting what you pay for?
Yes, there are 3 school systems here. If you'd been around a while you'd know that this newspaper and I personally long ago called for the systems to merge. But that's not going to happen. Been there, done that. It's a very long story covering 1953 to 1991.... Bone up on county history and you'll understand.
Please, for the love of God. Go back to reporting on how bad the Athens Banner Herald is. As for the schools merging, the people in Commerce and Jefferson don't need or want the Counties problems. Seriously, report on some crime or something, which is what you bash the herald for. Maybe even report on how a group of 13 year olds from all over the county are playing for a state champioship tonight in Jefferson. Will you be there? I am assuming not. You will probably be writing your next blog bashing how the COC built a new school or how the ABH didn't have detailed photos of a crime scene. BTW, do you have a hobby?