There will be up to 10 furlough days in the Jefferson City School System next year as part of a larger plan to cut costs in the system. The days won’t be decided and the calendar set until the city receives its state funds allotment sheet, officials said.
In addition to the furlough days, the Jefferson Board of Education last week approved cutting all elementary and middle school Spanish teaching positions as part of a reduction in force program.
Also as part of the plan, one elementary school counselor position and one kindergarten teaching position will be cut.
These cuts are not all the cuts the system plans to make. Other cuts come in the form of teacher resignations and reassignments.
Among those changes are: Not replacing an empty assistant principal position at Jefferson High School; combining the principal’s position for Jefferson Academy (3-5) and Jefferson Elementary School (Pre-K through 2); and combining some job functions for the assistant principal’s position at the middle school.
The reduction in force plan aims to lessen the impact from the reduction in state funding of $913,500 it experienced between Fiscal Year 2009 and FY 2010. The system is also expecting a further reduction in state funding of $118,650 for FY 2011.
For the full list of employee changes, see the print edition of The Jackson Herald for May 19, 2010.

Oliver is retiring effective the end of this fiscal year and, while this is a lot of added work on Gurley, it makes a HECK of a lot of sense when you think about the 1) the kids 2) the teachers (well kinda, see below) and 3) the taxpayers.
Essentially, Jefferson responded to a million dollar deficit by only letting go of 2 teachers (both Spanish positions).
If you'll notice, the counselor's position and the K teacher's position doesn't say they won't be retained elsewhere.
Not filling an AP position ($80,000+ and benefits) and not filling the JES principal's position ($95,000+ and benefits) easily saved 6+ teaching positions.
Excellent decisions by the BOE and Dr. Jackson.
Not that I expected anything less but this completely confirmed everything I ever thought about their work.
There aren't many negatives to this plan other than A) losing the Spanish program B) more work for well compensated professionals (who are VERY good people and easily capable of handling it in a productive and professional manner) C) Teachers losing all 10 teacher work days. This increases a ton of work on them- BUT it allows them to all keep their jobs.
Spanish just isn't something that our students will ever need after they graduate. Their ability to run "Track" will be much more beneficial to them and the community in the future. I understand that the Elementary School Principal, Diane Oliver, announced a great idea. Just replace all the Spanish teachers with the fine Computer CD by Rosetta Stone. Wow! Great idea!
But why stop there? I've come up with some more ideas that the School Board should look into.
The School Lunch Program could be eliminated with vending machines. Vending technology has come a long way! Students could purchase both hot and cold meals. A multitude of choices could be made available. Students would love it and the savings would be substantial.
Facebook's "Farmville" could replace the school's Ag program. The kids would live it. They could do it all from home without all the smells. From what I hear, Farmville even allows people to work together building their farms. Farmville would be far superior to the current Ag program, because it would allow students to learn so much more than just working with one or two animals. They would be able to maintain an entire farm. And, best of all Farmville is free! What a savings!
Oh, and speaking of the Ag program. It's really nice to see all the newly planted trees in front of the High School and Elementary School. I'm sure they'll be lovely to look at thru Dr. Jackson's window in the fall. This project must have been part of the Ag curriculum. Probably had the students do it as a project. Probably didn't cost the school anything.
The chorus programs could be replaced with the radio. This area is covered by numerous radio stations that play a variety of music. Why have someone waste time teaching the students when they could just sing-a-long with the radio. I'm sure it would be a great savings.
The media centers could all be replaced with the internet. The world wide web offers so much more that can be contained in a small school library. After closing the media centers the space could be used for other purposes. May be a new weight room! No need to spend $60k renovating the existing weigh room!
For those interested in Football, the MADDEN NFL 11 is available for the XBOX, PlayStation and Wii. Why actually play the game when you can do it on the computer! Wow! And if you're losing the game, just click the reset button. What a great savings the schools could reap here! And, no need to renovate the field house at Memorial Stadium. What's that going to cost?
It's great to see that our leaders are making the right choices that will provide our children with the best for their future. I'm sure spending on trees and track and other "fun" programs will be much more meaningful to a future employer. May be the priorities need to be examined. Is eliminating teachers the only answer? Other than eliminating the "redundant" Elementary School's Principal position is it really necessary to have so many administrators and assistant administrators?
Remember that the bids are due on May 27, 2010, for the track resurfacing project estimated at $340,000.
I enjoy sarcasm but typically when it's only well-rooted in the truth and factual information. Would you like to be corrected? Perhaps not but the people might like to know the facts...
1. Spanish: No REQUIRED Spanish classes were cut. Yes, Spanish is required to graduate high school in the State of Georgia- if I'm not mistaken. The Spanish program at JHS is still in tact. The only Spanish classes that were halted were those at JES (for children up to 8 years old), JA (for children up to 11 years old) and JMS (for children up to 14 years old. Repeat after me: All required Spanish classes remain.
2. No comment on the vending machine sarcasm.
3. No one is eliminating the Ag program. Last time I checked that's a viable career- specifically in Jackson County.
4. Not sure which stance you're taking on the trees. In one paragraph you say "probably didn't cost the school anything" and then in another you say "spending money on trees". May I please explain to you that nearly every one of the newly planted trees in the City limits was done free of charge through the Jefferson Heritage Tree Council. This includes the trees at JES, at the top of Memorial, at the Jefferson Rec Center, downtown, at JHS... all over. The Tree Council is a 100% volunteer organization chaired by Mary Dugan. She's a tremendous lady with tremendous passion and an army of volunteers; you should meet her sometime by volunteering. The trees are from an abandoned nursery off of Lyle Field Road. The administration of the project is done by a certified arborist that is being compensated through a grant obtained by the City. Zero cost here.
5. Are you saying that music programs should be cut because they're as valuable (or invaluable based on your argument) as elementary and middle school Spanish classes? Really? I bet you're a very cultured individual.
6. You'd like to close the media centers and open a weight room? I appreciate the sarcasm there since you're talking about facilities that were constructed when Jefferson's enrollment was 1/5 of what it is now. You grow, you need facilities- not sure why that's so hard to understand. I'm not sure of the last time I saw an elementary school Spanish contest draw $20,000-$30,000 worth of spectators on a Friday night. In other words, enough over the course of a season to foot the budget for nearly every other girls and boys athletic program the school could possibly offer. But, hey, let's not get started there. I'd hate to have to ask you to point out another AA public school within 50 miles that offers as many boys and girls athletic teams WITH the facilities to accomodate them AND quality coaches to instruct the participants.
7. Same thing that goes for the media center/weight room sarcasm applies to the field house argument.
8. Great. I'm glad you decided to pull out the "future employer", "fun" programs and "meaningful" cards and lay them on the table.
I guess the fact that students from JHS earn college scholarships to otherwise unattainable schools doesn't mean anything to you. I guess a AA State Championship in Track and Field and sending young men, ON SCHOLARSHIP, to the University of Tennessee and Lindsey Wilson ($27,000+/year) doesn't mean anything to you.
I won't spend too much time there because if you're so vehemently against improvements to athletic facilities I can't change your mind no matter what I say.
As far as a new track surface, field house improvements, weight rooms and other construction projects, Jose, perhaps it would benefit you to learn the difference between "budget money" and "SPLOST money".
Budget money is what comes from property taxes and from the State. It can be utilized for construction projects or, as in most cases, an actual BOE budget. How novel, right?
SPLOST money is what comes from local option sales taxes. You buy gas, dinner at Beef O'Brady's, a new hammer at Mitchell's, it doesn't matter. One cent of every dollar goes into the pot. It can be utilized for construction projects but NOT to foot a budget.
In other words, Jose, your elementary school Spanish program was not cut in favor of a new track surface. The money being used for the track surface and other construction projects can NOT be used to compensate a Spanish teacher or ANY salary. It's SPECIAL PURPOSE LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX dollars. It's collected by Jackson County, divided based on the population and earmarked for the Board of Education to use as they see fit for the betterment of the City School system.
If they want to they could build a $345,000 statue of Pancho Villa with it. Unfortunately, I'm sure that would draw more than one sarcastic remark.
Agradecimiento para juega, Jose!
Thank YOU for playing, however, this conversation is reserved for those of us who are literate in anything other than government lingo.
For example, Jose never said that required Spanish classes were cut. He was simply pointing out that elementary/middle school exposure to a foreign language actually prepares our students to compete in a global market, whereas sports do not. Our students would benefit from learning not only Spanish, but Mandarin Chinese, French, and Arabic as well. The question is not whether the funds are allotted to pay for these academic classes, but rather, why aren't they? In an increasingly competitive job market, our students need more marketable skills. You know, useful things like speaking other languages or excelling at techology, math or science. The point is, we need to use what little money we have more efficiently and in the best interests of our students academic needs.
Alternatively, they could end up like you, adept at understanding how and why the government misuses our tax dollars and inept at understanding the nuances of sarcasm and the importance of fluency in any language other than ignorance.
I am not a huge advocate of sports, so I am not coming at this from that standpoint. But I also feel that it is not necessary for a K-8 student to learn a different language. And if you don't care for that, I'm sure there are homes for sale in a Spanish speaking country where exposure to that language will happen on a daily basis. I'm pretty much over trying to stuff foreign culture down kids' throat.
P.S. Get off the "you need to be fluent in multiple languages in today's society to be successful". It's just not the case.
I'm a bit apprehensive about following these great literary minds here, LOL, but I'll give it a try.
Maria, did you read the part of WOW's post that mentioned the difference between SPLOST and normal taxes?
Also, sports do nothing to prepare kids for life? My dear, sports programs do plenty. Children who participate in them recieve experience in being part of a team and working together to acheive a common goal. Certainly a Liberal such as yourself should understand that. Competition is healthy, and by the way, I'm for keeping score at T-Ball games.
What one person may consider our kids interests to be may differ considerably from what another thinks. I rather think learning to speak Mandarin Chinese or Arabic is a bit lower on the priority list than you for example. Spanish, well.....I think a pre-requisite of High School requirement is enough. If someone wants to go on from there...fine.
As for the Global comment. I think America needs to be a bit less "Global" myself. Our economy is an indicator of that right now. I remember when there was a textile mill in most small towns in Georgia where people had jobs that recirculated money through local economies. We were less dependent on government for our answers, not many of us spoke Spanish and we seemed to do fine.
What is wrong with people taking the initative to learn these languages on their own? I'm an old Reading, Writing and Arithmetic guy myself. I have a serious problem with Government "requiring" Spanish to graduate to begin with. More over, I think "requiring" Spanish students to speak fluent English would be more appropriate.
This country became the greatest place in the world to live with a motto: Mama, Baseball and Apple Pie.