Social networking continues to gain popularity and with its expansion comes an increased awareness of what’s appropriate and what isn’t.
Locally, the community has been riveted by the story of a teacher at Apalachee High School in Barrow County. The school system allegedly received an email from a concerned parent over photos that were taken of teacher Ashley Payne while on vacation. The photos were allegedly accessed through Payne’s Facebook page and in them, she was holding alcoholic beverages.
Payne resigned on Aug. 27 after being confronted about the matter, but has since filed suit against the Barrow County School System.
In Jackson County school systems, the focus has been less on teachers and more about student access to sites, officials said.
There are concerns about regulating what employees can post on personal websites. Many view strict control over Internet use as violations of privacy.
It’s something Jefferson City Schools Superintendent John Jackson believes is a fine line.
“There is a balance within this matter that must be recognized and maintained,” he said.
In all Jackson County school systems, users – teachers and students - are subject to the monitoring of their online activities. It’s aimed at protecting minors from accessing harmful material.
None of the policies in the Jackson County systems mention social networking.
“It can clearly become one more area where balancing the Constitutional rights of an educator with appropriate professional conduct can come into play," Jackson said. “This issue has been on the table for years. When you get right down to it, it seems to me that the same principals that have always applied still apply.”
Similarly, the Commerce City School System also lacks any specific social networking guidelines.
Superintendent Mac McCoy doesn’t see the immediate need to amend the system’s policy.
Jackson County’s policy was adopted in 2005. The policy is similar to that of Commerce and Jefferson. It does have an area specifically intended for staff, but it doesn’t discuss social networking.
Of the three systems, each mentions that an employee could lose their job over Internet indiscretions, but these indiscretions involve the access of material that is obscene, pornographic or harmful to minors and is accessed while on school property.

The school can contact a free proxy site being used threw the schools proxy server and get any information students have downloaded and all pages they have used from that proxy site.
http://www.gapsc.com/Rules/Current/Ethics/505-6-.01.pdf
Regardless of whether it is a social on-line site or a social club in town, these standards should be followed. The only difference in the two situations I see is, one venue gives photographic proof of misconduct (if any) and the other is simply word of mouth. The real question is, Would you be upset if you and your child went to any restaurant and saw your child's teacher having a beer or glass of wine? If you said yes, it really doesn't matter if it is on Facebook or not, your going to be upset.
Trying to turn this into a technology problem is just silly. Teachers already have a code of conduct they are held accountable to. The form in which their behavior is recorded or exposed is irrelevant.
Undoubtedly teachers are held to a higher standard of PUBLIC behavior than other people because of their direct influence over minors. Teachers KNOW this when they enter the profession. The internet is public domain, plain and simple. Regardless of any contact you may have entered into with a service provider to keep your information private, your are posting that information in a public domain.
Here is analogy for you: Your a teacher and you hand naked pictures of yourself to the guy next door and tell him to keep them secret. You even make him sign a piece of paper stating he will keep them secret. Then his kid finds them in his locked desk draw. Do you think the judge will say "OHHH well you told him to keep them secret, that makes it ok"? That is exactly the same as posting pictures on ANY website.
And for the record I would like to say in my opinion, Anyone over the age of 21 having a glass of wine or a beer is in no way misconduct. Smiling while having a glass of wine is in no way misconduct. Hugging your friend, smiling, while having a glass of wine is not misconduct.